The part you quoted is not the actual article, but spam comment pushing sham medicine. The quoted text is nonsensical, and an obvious attempt to deceive the masses by imitating medical/scientific writing tone.
The actual article merely states that they have made white blood cells in the mouse which are immune to infection by HIV through modification of a surface protein. Even if it works in people, it's at best an expensive and awkward treatment - HIV kills by destroying white blood cells, thus crippling the immune system, resulting in patients dying to other pathogens which are normally not a threat. The scientists have demonstrated that white blood cells which are immune to HIV. But white blood cells are produced constantly in the body (and are constantly replenished over time) - so to turn this into a treatment, you'd need to make the body produce the HIV-immune white blood cells (we don't have a way to do this), or continually give patients infusions of these cells produced in vitro (production is certain to be slow, difficult, and hence expensive). And that's all assuming the whole thing works in humans at all!
This is nowhere near a cure for HIV, and in fact describes work that is farther from a "cure" than other recent research.
And, the source you're linking to is practically a tabloid, if you couldn't tell from the article's writing style.
